Ok, not as close as I remember on the smog test to Bryans as I thought. Scanner ain't workin' so'o I cain't shows ya the achull thang, but......... Consider this is using a set of WEB Cams 294 grind. 244* duration(only 4* more than stock) with a higher lift of 8.15mm. And not timed properly.
HC was measured at 1002 RPM at 27 PPM, and at 2474 RPM at 34 PPM.
CO was measured at 1002 RPM at 0.01%, and at 2474 RPM at 0.01%
NO wasn't measured as we are in the backwoods and not required to do so, YET! But judging by the HC being a little rich I don't think that would be an issue. So Mike, think you might want to run a set of these cams? Might run a little cleaner if timed right too. I did try the 'hypermiling' thing on 1 tank and got 48.sumpin mpg. You don't want to drive that way! Believe me!